Why Creators Struggle to Let Go of Their Own Ideas
Jin Kim, George E. Newman · September 4, 2026
New research reveals a cognitive bias called the 'Creative Endowment Effect.' When people generate ideas, they tend to overvalue them, even when they are objectively worse than alternatives. In experiments, participants submitted more low-quality ideas when choosing from their own pool versus someone else's, despite financial incentives to pick only the best. This bias persists even when people are warned about it, but it fades when they revisit ideas months later.
Why it matters: For businesses and individual creators, this bias can lead to poor decisions—like sticking with mediocre product concepts, marketing campaigns, or investment strategies simply because they originated internally. It may also explain why teams struggle to kill projects they've nurtured, leading to sunk-cost fallacies.
Practical implication: To improve decision-making, organizations should separate idea generation from evaluation, perhaps using external reviewers or delaying assessments. Individuals can benefit from 'sleeping on' ideas before judging them. For investors, this highlights risks in companies that rely heavily on internal innovation without external checks.
Source: arXiv paper by Jin Kim and George E. Newman. Read the full paper at https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05115
Educational content only, generated with AI assistance from public research abstracts. Not investment advice. Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability.