TreasureX Researchecon.GNMicrofinance Competition and the Moneylender Puzzle
Shyamal Chowdhury, Prabal Roy Chowdhury, Joeri Smits · October 8, 2026
Microfinance has expanded for decades, yet moneylenders keep thriving alongside microfinance institutions (MFIs) — even though MFIs often charge lower rates. Why?
This paper builds a model where borrowers use MFI loans for production but face shocks that make repayment hard. Moneylenders step in as emergency "bridge" lenders, letting borrowers repay the MFI and keep future access to credit. That threat of losing MFI access is what makes borrowers repay in the first place.
The authors then ask what happens when more MFIs enter. Theoretically, the effect on MFI lending is ambiguous: competition can weaken repayment incentives, but it can also crowd out moneylenders as bridge lenders. The effect on moneylender credit, however, is clearly negative.
To test this, the researchers ran a village-level randomized expansion in Bangladesh, stratified by existing MFI presence. Adding one more MFI cut the number of moneylender loans by roughly 30–40% two to three years later, with no measurable change in MFI borrowing or total borrowing.
The practical takeaway: where MFIs rely on exclusion threats and moneylenders supply emergency finance, new MFI entry mainly displaces expensive informal credit rather than expanding formal credit. Gains may be largest in less saturated markets — relevant for policymakers and investors in financial inclusion.
Source: arXiv paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12186
Educational content only, generated with AI assistance from public research abstracts. Not investment advice. Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability.