TreasureX Researchq-fin.GNWhy Irrational Traders Never Fully Disappear From Markets
Cheng Zhang · October 29, 2026
Classical finance assumes a simple sorting process: rational traders profit, irrational ones lose, and the irrational eventually exit. Reality disagrees — noise trading, herding and rule-of-thumb behavior persist even in deep, sophisticated markets. This paper builds an evolutionary game model in which two behavioral types, relatively rational (R) and boundedly rational (N), compete, and their population shares shift over time based on relative performance.
The key insight is that the two types are not always pure rivals. When their interaction is complementary — rational traders earn from mispricing that N-types create, while N-types benefit from the liquidity and price correction R-types provide — and when the gap in trading frictions between them is moderate, the market settles at a stable mix containing both types. Bounded rationality becomes a permanent feature, not a temporary flaw. If instead the interaction turns antagonistic, that same mix becomes a tipping point: the market can flip toward one type dominating entirely.
The practical takeaway concerns costs. Cheaper disciplined trading — think algorithmic execution and AI-driven strategies — steadily raises the rational share, but it does not wipe out the other type unless the cost advantage crosses an explicit threshold. For investors, this implies mispricing and behavioral flows are likely to remain a durable source of opportunity rather than a fading anomaly.
Source: arXiv preprint by Cheng Zhang — https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39198
Educational content only, generated with AI assistance from public research abstracts. Not investment advice. Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability.